Giving Uniswap the LUV: One Pool at Maximum — and the Road to Many

This is the liquidity reference of record for SHAMBA LUV. One Uniswap V2 pool holds the market. It was seeded at the literal maximum a V2 pair can hold — 2¹¹²−1 wei of LUV — and every number below is read from the chain, not from a press release. The pair creates the price; Uniswap expresses it; the protocol’s own oracle reads it straight from the pool’s reserves, block-anchored, every minute.

This page states what is in the pool, when it was deployed, and where the source lives — then explores what a second pool at maximum would mean, using WBTC as the example. The public landing page is luv.pythai.net; the source of record is github.com/SHAMBA-LUV.

Launch, to the second

Signed by bankon.eth · read from the chain

Two deployments define SHAMBA LUV. Both were signed by the treasury, bankon.eth (0x10f7Ee…D169). Neither date is a claim — each one is a block.

The pair was minted by the canonical Uniswap V2 factory 0x5C69bEe7…aA6f. 40 hours and 16 minutes separate the token from its market — the gap in which the supply was arranged and the pool was loaded.

The liquidity of record

Block 25,706,054 · 2026-08-07 22:24:23 UTC

Full 18-decimal precision. Any rounding shown here is display only — the exact value sits beneath every headline figure.

The pool has done what a pool does: LUV out, ETH in. The number that matters is circulating supply: 106,130,551,467,685,572 LUV, measured on-chain net of the 4,980,559,643,425,538 LUV burned to 0x…dEaD — excluded from reflections and unable to come back. Of that circulating float, 1,590,658,735,764,077 LUV (1.4988%) sits in the LUV/WETH pair at 0x57D2085Aa859a145cB107845AD03c0eAAFBD8a31 — the reserves that set the price.

At the moment of reading: pool depth ≈ $624.39 · market cap ≈ $19,859 · FDV ≈ $20,791 · ETH/USD $1,913.60, the median of three independent inputs. These move; the method does not. The live surfaces are authoritative over this page: view.html for the screener, LUV.html for the price to the wei.

Why one pool, at maximum

Concentration is the design

• Undivided depth. Every unit of liquidity works in one book; price impact is as small as the total ETH committed can make it.
• One truth for the oracle. The oracle reads getReserves() on this one pair — the price is a measurement, not an average of venues. Each reading carries a chronos attestation (block number and block time), because a price without a time is a rumor. That reading is expressed, both ways and to the wei, at LUV.html.
• Concentrated reflections. Every market trade pays 5%, split 3:1:1 — 3% reflected to holders, 1% to liquidity, 1% to the team. One venue means every trade feeds the same holders. The 3% pays you to hold; the 1% liquidity point permanently deepens the pool, defending what you hold. Wallet-to-wallet transfers carry no fee at all: 1 LUV is 1 LUV. Why each of these exists at all — the rule that an organ enters the LUV engine only as the implementation of a stated emotonomic commitment, form following field — is set out in the engine paper (canonical source: docs/LUV_ENGINE.md).

The road to many: a second pool, also at maximum

WBTC · the address is already knowable

Because Uniswap V2 pairs are CREATE2 contracts, the address of a pool that does not exist yet is already determined. The future LUV/WBTC pair — WBTC being Bitcoin’s canonical representation on Ethereum (0x2260FAC5E5542a773Aa44fBCfeDf7C193bc2C599) — will live at 0x95f9d3e5E681D3bD6E396E5444fd3d210490711D. We verified against the factory that this pair is unborn (getPair returns the zero address as of this writing). If and when the community gives Uniswap more LUV, that is where Bitcoin-denominated LUV will trade.

What it takes, technically — the same wiring the WETH pool received:

1. Create the pair on the Uniswap V2 factory.
2. Owner calls excludeFromReflection(pair) — pools must not absorb holder reflections.
3. Owner calls setMaxTxExemption(pair, true) — pool transfers clear the 1% anti-whale gate.
4. Seed both sides from treasury working capital — never from locked principal.

Two pools divide depth — that is the cost, and it is real. But two pools are also joined by arbitrage: any gap between the WETH price and the WBTC price of LUV is free money to close, and every arbitrage trade pays the 5% fee. Fragmented liquidity, arb-linked, becomes a fee engine: more surfaces where trades happen, more reflections raining on every holder. The trade-off resolves into a sequencing rule rather than a dilemma — deepen the WETH pool toward its first million first; branch to WBTC when depth is no longer the binding constraint. One pool at maximum today; many pools at maximum in turn.

Trade LUV — Uniswap is the DEX

One pool · one venue · both directions

the DEX

▲ Buy LUV

$→Buy 1,000,000,000,000 LUV with USDC ❤↗
Ξ→Ξ or buy the trillion with ETH↗
₿→₿ or buy the trillion with WBTC↗

set slippage to ~10% — LUV carries a 5% reflection fee · LUV arrives preloaded, one trillion preset as the output

▼ Sell LUV

→$Sell LUV to USDC↗
→ΞSell LUV to ETH↗
→₿Sell LUV to WBTC↗

same 5% on the way out · size the trade yourself · raise slippage in fast markets

📈 live view — candles, RSI, MACD
🎓 the field paper

The contracts — source of record

github.com/SHAMBA-LUV

Verified means one thing: the green checkmark on Etherscan, where the published source compiles to the deployed bytecode. Not an audit, not a screenshot, not a badge.

Build profile for the token, so anyone can reproduce the bytecode: solc 0.8.24, optimizer on at 200 runs, viaIR off, EVM version cancun — as declared in foundry.toml. The security posture and the test evidence are published in the same repository:

• SECURITY.md — the disclosure policy and security posture, stated plainly.
• 174 curated tests, each one checkmarked.
• Detailed findings are held under OVERLORD access while they remain live and unfixed — responsible disclosure, not security theatre.

Automated scanners flag every fee-on-transfer token by reflex. The answer is not a counter-badge: the contract is verified and the source is open, and the token carries no blacklist, no pause, no mint, no sell-block — fees can only ever be lowered. Read it yourself; that is what the links are for.

Where the numbers live

This page will age · these do not

References. The papers behind the design — engine.html, the LUV engine derived from emotonomics — canonical markdown at docs/LUV_ENGINE.md ·emotonomics.html, the field paper · wei.html, the arithmetic · exabyte.html, the identity · sentiment.html, the measurement. Live surfaces — luv.pythai.net · view.html · LUV.html.

SHARE the LUV

Sharing is caring · sharing is the marketing

LUV is measured in attention as much as in reserves. Sharing this page is the cheapest honest thing anyone can do for it — and if you share from the LUV dashboard while signed in, the tweet rail pays you LUV for it.

Music for the trade

the record · Professor Codephreak

The DEX is open; so is the record. Music 4 Robots 2 Dance 2 by Mag Magnus — press play and let it run.

crewbus Lab — the 2025 Shambhala Mix Series. The set the launch record grew out of: a curated series on Mag Magnus, featuring The Funk Hunters’ 2025 Shambhala Mix.

Also on the record: crewbus Lab — 2025 Shambhala Mix Series · LIVE FROM SHAMBHALA 2026 — the launch set, from the Sunday night the pair went live — and takIT. Played from SoundCloud.

SHAMBA © 2026 LUV · luv.pythai.net · github.com/SHAMBA-LUV · luv@pythai.net
Read the field paper: Emotonomics: An Extension of Economics for the Knowledge Economy.
Powered by Etherscan.io APIs. The Uniswap, Etherscan and SoundCloud names and marks belong to their respective owners (Uniswap Labs; Etherscan; SoundCloud) and are used here for identification, with attribution.