Gödel

core choice logging and self-improvement readiness

Current state

  • AGInt (agents/core/agint.py): Logs perception, rule-based decision, orient (LLM) response, and BDI delegation via memory_agent.log_process() to per-agent process_trace.jsonl under data/memory/.../agent_workspaces/<agent_id>/process_trace.jsonl. No single stream of “choices” for auditing.
  • BDI in backend (mindx_backend_service/main_service.py): Sets chosen_agent from keyword rules, updates bdi_state and in-memory activity_log, and appends text lines to data/logs/agint/agint_cognitive_cycles.log. No structured choice record.
  • mindXagent (agents/core/mindXagent.py): _log_action_choices() only appends to in-memory self.action_choices (for UI). No persistent log. Improvement loop uses rule-based _identify_improvement_opportunities and _prioritize_improvements (no LLM); Ollama is used for chat/inject_user_prompt and is notified at startup.
  • StartupAgent (agents/orchestration/startup_agent.py): After Ollama connect, calls _notify_mindxagent_startup(ollama_result). autonomous_startup_improvement() uses Ollama (ollama_api.generate_text) to analyze startup and suggest improvements; results are logged via log_process but not as a normalized “core choice” with rationale/outcome.

To show that mindX is or is not a Gödel machine, we need a single, accurate log of core choices: what was perceived, what options were considered, what was chosen, why, and (when available) outcome.


1. Gödel choice schema and global log

  • Schema (one JSON object per line in a single file):
    • source_agent, cycle_id (or request_id), timestamp_utc
    • choice_type: e.g. agint_decision | bdi_agent_selection | mindx_improvement_selection | startup_ollama_improvement | mindx_action_choice
    • perception_summary: short description of input/context
    • options_considered: list of options (e.g. agent names, improvement goals)
    • chosen_option: the selected option
    • rationale: why this was chosen (rule name, LLM excerpt, or fixed string)
    • outcome: optional, filled when known (e.g. success/failure, or deferred)
    • Optional: llm_model when the choice involves Ollama/LLM output
  • Location: data/logs/godel_choices.jsonl (single global file, append-only).
  • Implementation: Add log_godel_choice(self, choice_record: Dict[str, Any]) -> Optional[Path] on MemoryAgent that:
    • Ensures data/logs (and optionally data/logs/agint) exists.
    • Appends one JSON line to data/logs/godel_choices.jsonl.
    • Optionally also calls existing log_process("godel_core_choice", choice_record, {"agent_id": choice_record.get("source_agent", "system")}) so choices remain queryable via existing process_trace/timestamped memory.

2. Instrument core decision points

  • AGInt (agents/core/agint.py): After the rule-based decision in _orient_and_decide (and after LLM orient if used), build a Gödel choice record from:
    • source_agent = self.agent_id
    • choice_type = agint_decision
    • perception_summary = truncated perception or directive
    • options_considered = list of decision types (e.g. BDI_DELEGATION, RESEARCH, etc.) relevant to the rule
    • chosen_option = the actual decision_type (and target if any)
    • rationale = rule reason or orient response summary Call memory_agent.log_godel_choice(record) (if memory_agent exists).
  • Backend BDI (mindx_backend_service/main_service.py): Immediately after chosen_agent is set and before update_bdi_state, build a Gödel choice record:
    • source_agent = e.g. bdi_directive_handler
    • choice_type = bdi_agent_selection
    • perception_summary = directive (truncated)
    • options_considered = list(available_agents.keys())
    • chosen_option = chosen_agent
    • rationale = bdi_reasoning string Obtain memory_agent from the same place as other backend logging (e.g. command_handler.mastermind.memory_agent) and call await memory_agent.log_godel_choice(record).
  • mindXagent (agents/core/mindXagent.py): In _log_action_choices(), after appending to self.action_choices, build a Gödel choice record from the same context and choices (options_considered = goals/reasons, chosen_option = first item), and call await self.memory_agent.log_godel_choice(record) so every improvement selection is persisted.
  • mindXagent autonomous improvement loop: When an improvement is executed (success or failure), append a second record (or extend outcome) so the log has “selected” and “executed” with outcome (e.g. success/failure or error message).
  • StartupAgent (agents/orchestration/startup_agent.py): In autonomous_startup_improvement(), when Ollama returns analysis and suggestions and the agent applies or rejects them, log a Gödel choice:
    • choice_type = startup_ollama_improvement
    • perception_summary = e.g. “startup log analysis”
    • options_considered = list of suggested improvements (from Ollama response)
    • chosen_option = the one applied (or “none” if none applied)
    • rationale = excerpt from Ollama analysis
    • llm_model = model used Use await self.memory_agent.log_godel_choice(record).

3. Ollama-driven self-improvement readiness

  • Already in place: StartupAgent connects to Ollama on startup, notifies mindXagent via _notify_mindxagent_startup(ollama_result); mindXagent uses Ollama for chat and inject_user_prompt. StartupAgent’s autonomous_startup_improvement() uses Ollama to analyze startup and suggest improvements.
  • No code change required to “start” self-improvement from Ollama beyond ensuring the above logging is in place so that when you run autonomous startup improvement (or mindXagent improvement loop), every core choice is recorded.
  • Optional: If you want the mindXagent improvement loop to use Ollama for prioritization (instead of only rule-based priority), that would be a separate enhancement: call Ollama in _prioritize_improvements or after _identify_improvement_opportunities and log that as a Gödel choice (choice_type e.g. mindx_ollama_prioritization).

4. API and UI (optional)

  • API: Add a read-only endpoint, e.g. GET /godel/choices?limit=50&source_agent=..., that reads the last N lines from data/logs/godel_choices.jsonl, parses JSON lines, and returns them (newest first). This allows external auditing and dashboards.
  • UI: Small widget on Platform or Admin tab: “Last N core choices” table (source, type, chosen option, rationale, time). Fetches from the new API.

5. File and dependency summary

AreaFile(s)Change
Core directivedocs/survive.mdNew file: inference-first mandate, mindX.sh commands, API/rate limits, find inference, free to paid, THOT/DAIO
Schema + global logagents/memory_agent.pyAdd log_godel_choice(), ensure data/logs and godel_choices.jsonl
StartupAgentagents/orchestration/startup_agent.pyWhen _auto_connect_ollama fails, call ensure_ollama_available() then retry; log startup_ollama_bootstrap; in autonomous_startup_improvement log Gödel choice
AGIntagents/core/agint.pyAfter decide, build and log Gödel choice
BDI backendmindx_backend_service/main_service.pyAfter choosing agent, get memory_agent and log Gödel choice
mindXagentagents/core/mindXagent.pyIn _log_action_choices, persist via log_godel_choice; in improvement loop log execution outcome
APImindx_backend_service/main_service.pyAdd GET /godel/choices (optional)
UImindx_frontend_ui/components/platform-tab.js or admin tab“Last core choices” widget (optional)

6. Order of implementation

  1. Core directive: Create docs/survive.md with the inference-first mandate and mindX.sh commands (see section 0).
  2. StartupAgent as inference controller: Add bootstrap-on-failure in StartupAgent: when _auto_connect_ollama() returns connected: False, call ensure_ollama_available() then retry; log Gödel choice startup_ollama_bootstrap / inference_acquired. (Requires log_godel_choice() to exist — so step 3 may be done first or in parallel.)
  3. Add log_godel_choice() on MemoryAgent and create data/logs/godel_choices.jsonl on first write.
  4. Instrument StartupAgent _auto_connect_ollama (success and bootstrap), then autonomous_startup_improvement; then AGInt, BDI in main_service, mindXagent _log_action_choices and improvement execution.
  5. Add GET /godel/choices and UI widget if desired.

After this, all core choices (including inference acquisition and Ollama-driven startup/improvement) are logged in one place, so you can audit whether mindX behaves like a Gödel machine (inference as lifeblood; self-improvement decisions and rationale visible and traceable).

Related articles

aGLM with enhanced RAGE from MASTERMIND

aGLM, or Autonomous General Learning Model, is a sophisticated machine learning model that integrates aspects of both supervised and unsupervised learning to analyze and interpret data across various applications like natural language processing, image recognition, and financial forecasting. This model is designed to efficiently handle large volumes of data and is particularly effective as a foundational tool for building more complex models. Key features of aGLM include: Dynamic Learning: aGLM can process and learn from […]

Learn More
SimpleMind

blueprint for a SimpleMind Using easyAGI

Abstract: This article conceptualizes the creation of an advanced Autonomous General Intelligence (AGI) system, named “easyAGI,” integrating several cutting-edge AI components. Theoretical in nature, this blueprint outlines the essential modules required to construct such a system, emphasizing the principles behind each component without delving into implementation specifics. Introduction: The pursuit of AGI aims to create a machine capable of understanding, learning, and performing intellectual tasks across various domains, akin to human cognitive abilities. The easyAGI […]

Learn More

RAGE MASTERMIND with aGLM

RAGE MASTERMIND with aGLM: A Comprehensive Analysis In the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence and machine learning, the integration of advanced generative models with autonomous systems has become a focal point for developers and researchers. One such integration is the RAGE MASTERMIND with aGLM (Autonomous General Learning Model), a pioneering approach in AI development. This report delves into the specifics of this integration, exploring its components, functionalities, and potential implications in the broader context […]

Learn More